Articles by Kris Pedersen.
Those of you who are knowledgeable about the NZ mortgage landscape may have heard in the past about Resimac’s Specialist Investor Product. This offered a great longer-term solution for those who wanted to hold investment properties but couldn’t meet overly cautious bank affordability criteria.
While this product left the market a while back, the initial signs are that it may have been replaced by something even better.
While we are still working through some test cases, indications are that there is a new competitively priced product which will be very useful for the investor whose equity position is strong but is held back because of how the banks look at their cashflow.
To explain further: as an investor grows their portfolio, there becomes a larger and larger gap between reality, i.e. how an investor will look at their cashflow, and how a bank does.
Why is that?
The banks tend to scale the rental income to circa 75% of what is received. Then on the mortgage side, they assess everything at considerably higher interest rates (currently assessed at circa 7%). On top of that, even though the investor may have their mortgages on interest-only, they will always be assessed as if the investor is paying principal and interest.
Example – bank vs investor cashflow assessment
Let’s say an investor (we’ll call him John) built a portfolio where he had the following:
• $3.5m of investment property returning a gross yield of 5% ($175k)
• Annual non-mortgage costs of $50k for running the portfolio
• $2m of debt at a 5% interest rate on an interest-only basis
• All debt taken on a 30-year term and was 10 years into the term (i.e. there were 20 years remaining).
The difference between John’s view and the bank’s view is roughly as follows:
What happens for most investors is that they cover the bank’s negative view of their portfolio’s cashflow from their other income streams. Then as their portfolio grows, most tend to eventually hit a ‘servicing’ wall.
What this new product allows is the ability to look at a property on a stand-alone basis and disregard the remainder of the customer’s position.
There are some other rules around this that need to be noted. For instance, generally the funder will look at the entity and how it stacks up. If this proves to be a hurdle, having access to an expert asset structuring firm such as Gilligan Rowe & Associates may provide solutions.
Example – how the new lending formula works
So, let’s say part of John’s portfolio was a $600,000 property that was rented for $700 per week. If other criteria could be met, the way this non-bank lender would view this as follows:
(Rental x 80%) > (mortgage amount on principal and interest x interest rate + 1%)
As this looks confusing, let’s put some more numbers in. The interest rate that John would be charged in this case is likely to be 6.29% (likely dropping to 6.04% after this week’s cash review).
This means that the formula is:
$3031 (monthly rent) x 80% = $2,425
$2,425 has to be more than the mortgage cost on a principal and interest basis with a 1% loading added.
By jumping onto our mortgage calculator at https://www.krispedersen.co.nz/calculator/ and putting in an interest rate of 7.29% (1% more than the interest rate being charged) and then playing around with the loan amount, it can be seen that the maximum loan amount is circa $353k.
Summary
Keep in mind other criteria must be satisfied, but with this product it is possible to get a long-term mortgage at rates close to a bank floating rate when otherwise the investor may be locked out of the market.
If you would like to discuss this further or have any questions, please contact Kris Pedersen here.
I would like to say thank you for the opportunity for allowing me to come to the property school at Gilligan Rowe + Associates. Im in my early stages of becoming a property investor in New Zealand and to able to come to the property school has enabled to me gain very valuable information and knowledge which will help me be successful in property investing. The property school itself is one like no other because there is so much value given and from experts that practise what they are teaching. This in property school was one of the main highlights because being able to meet experts through the property school was my first time and gave me more confidence in general about property investment. Having combined reading the books (Property 101, Tax structures 101) at home and attending property school, the breath of valuable information and knowledge I have attained is substantial. - Tesfalidet, December 2019
Gilligan Rowe and Associates is a chartered accounting firm specialising in property, asset planning, legal structures, taxation and compliance.
We help new, small and medium property investors become long-term successful investors through our education programmes and property portfolio planning advice. With our deep knowledge and experience, we have assisted hundreds of clients build wealth through property investment.
Learn More
Free Resources, Tools & Downloads
